• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TechEngage

TechEngage®

Hands-on reviews, research-backed buying guides and technology news.

  • News
  • AI
  • Mobile
  • Apps
  • Reviews
  • More
    • Security
    • Internet & Social
    • Computing
    • Gadgets
    • Gaming
    • Car Tech
    • Business
    • Science & Health
TechEngage » Tech News & Analysis

We still lack adequate evidence about the usefulness of police body cameras

Avatar for Jessica Baron, PhD Jessica Baron, PhD Connect with Jessica Baron, PhD on LinkedIn Published: Mar 28, 2019 · 5:21 PM ET

A photo of Police uniform with body camera
via Pixabay
FacebookTweetPinLinkedInPrint
There has been a tremendous amount of research into the use of police body cameras over the last 5 years. Now, criminologists from George Mason University’s Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy have examined 70 of those papers and have published a summary of the findings in the journal Criminology & Public Policy. They also found that there had been a 14-fold increase in the number of studies conducted since 2014. The researchers explain that while both officers and citizens tend to support the use of body cameras, there are still significant gaps in our knowledge when it comes to how they influence police-citizen relationships. Police body cameras (PBCs) were widely adopted in the U.S. against the backdrop of public outcry about the uneven use of force against minority communities and President Obama’s 2015 Task Force on 21st Century Policing report and the funding bump it provided. The George Mason team pointed out that the call for change coincided with the surveillance industry’s development of body cameras, leading police to invest in the new technology without clear proof that it worked:
“Because the rapid adoption of BWCs was driven by public protest, law enforcement concerns, a historical backdrop, government funding, and the development of portable video technology, it should not be any surprise that BWCs were quickly adopted in a low-research environment.”
The researchers further note that the rapid adoption of technology in a “low research environment is not unusual in the world of police technology adoption,” but that scientific inquiry is necessary to avoid “unintended consequences for police officers, their organizations, and citizens.”
“Without the results of rigorous research and evaluation, law enforcement leaders are left to rely on best guesses, hunches, notions about ‘craft,’ and ‘group think’ about the impact of technologies like BWCs.”
For those who want to investigate the laws regulating body cameras in the U.S. by state, the National Council of Legislatures has listed them on their website. The studies incorporated into the George Mason team’s latest report addressed the impact of body cameras on officers’ behavior, their attitudes towards the cameras, how citizens felt about the cameras, citizens’ behavior when an officer was wearing a camera, and the role that cameras played in criminal investigations. In addition to finding that officers and citizens tend to be supportive of the cameras, the research team also found evidence that officers’ opinions of cameras improved the more they wore one. The use of cameras did tend to reduce the number of complaints filed against officers, though we don’t know precisely why that is the case. Despite earlier findings that the cameras reduced the use of force, the new study did not find enough evidence that the cameras cause dramatic changes in police behavior. Interestingly, there was no evidence of a “Ferguson effect,” in which police under scrutiny cut back on proactive policing (a complex topic that is not straightforwardly positive or negative since it can both reduce crime or create animosity towards police depending on the context), with the use of cameras. Many things remain unclear due to a lack of evidence, including whether cameras change citizens’ reporting behavior or their satisfaction with police encounters, their views of the police, their behavior towards officers during police encounters, or their relationship with the police. A mixed bag of results indicates that we’ve largely overestimated the effects of body cameras. That doesn’t mean that they are bad, only that we have more research to do into whether and how police can use them most effectively. People have a tendency to overestimate the usefulness of new technology, especially when it’s designed to solve problems – like crime – that has proved too complex for humans to solve themselves. In 2015, 19% of police departments had adopted body cameras with an additional 77% saying that they planned to adopt them in the near future. As, nearly half (47%) of U.S. general-purpose law enforcement agencies were employing body-worn cameras (BWCs). For those who had not yet acquired them, the most common reason was the cost associated with their purchase, data storage, and maintenance – not their usefulness. The authors concluded that body cameras “will not be an easy panacea for improving police performance, accountability, and relationships with citizens.” They also responsibly state that there’s simply not enough clear-cut evidence on which to base policy until police and researchers give more attention to how this technology can be both beneficial and harmful to citizens as well as how it can most effectively be used in training and internal investigations. Only once we start to address these issues will the investment in body cameras have the long-term potential to improve performance and accountability in policing.

Related reading

  • Apple Officially Announced “Peek Performance” March 8 event
  • Meta, YouTube and other tech giants are blocking Russia over Onslaught on Ukraine
  • Education Technology Trends That Will Shape Learning
  • What to expect from Apple September Event

Filed Under: Tech News & Analysis Tagged With: News

Related Stories

  • Googlebook Shows How Android 17 And Gemini Intelligence Could Reshape Google’S Ecosystem

    Googlebook Shows How Android 17 and Gemini Intelligence Could Reshape Google’s Ecosystem

    AIMay 16, 2026

  • Iphone 18 Pro And Pro Max Available Today In 65+ Countries

    iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max Available Today in 65+ Countries

    Tech News & AnalysisSep 18, 2026

  • Samsung Starts One Ui 9 (Android 17) Rollout On Galaxy S26 Series

    Samsung Starts One UI 9 (Android 17) Rollout on Galaxy S26 Series

    Tech News & AnalysisSep 17, 2026

Stay on top of technology

Get TechEngage reviews, buying guides and news in your feed.

Follow on Google News
FacebookTweetPinLinkedInPrint
Avatar for Jessica Baron, PhD

Jessica Baron, PhD

Science & Health Tech Correspondent

Dr. Jessica Baron is a Science and Health Tech Correspondent at TechEngage. She holds a PhD in History and Philosophy of Science from the University of Notre Dame and has written for outlets including Forbes, HuffPost, and The Daily Beast. She covers health technology, cybersecurity, robotics, and artificial intelligence, bringing an academic and ethical perspective to her reporting.

Joined TechEngage December 2018First article on TechEngage January 2019

Reader Interactions

Share Your Thoughts Cancel reply

Please read our comment policy before submitting your comment. Your email address will not be used or published anywhere. You will only receive comment notifications if you opt to subscribe below.

Primary Sidebar

Follow us on Google News

Recent Stories

  • Iphone 18 Pro Availability Sept 18 |
    Tech News & AnalysisiPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max Available Today in 65+ CountriesSep 18, 2026
  • Best Portable Monitors 2026 |
    Reviews & Buying GuidesBest Portable Monitors in 2026: 8 Picks for Travel, Work, and PlaySep 18, 2026
  • Samsung One Ui 9 Android 17 Rollout |
    Tech News & AnalysisSamsung Starts One UI 9 (Android 17) Rollout on Galaxy S26 SeriesSep 17, 2026
  • Best Wireless Mice 2026 |
    Reviews & Buying GuidesBest Wireless Mice in 2026: 8 Picks for Work, Travel, and PlaySep 17, 2026
  • Microsoft Windows Surface Event Oct 7 2026 |
    Tech News & AnalysisMicrosoft Confirms October 7 Windows and Surface Event for Local AI PCsSep 16, 2026

More in Tech News & Analysis

  • Iphone 18 Pro Availability Sept 18 |
    Tech News & AnalysisiPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max Available Today in 65+ CountriesSep 18, 2026
  • Samsung One Ui 9 Android 17 Rollout |
    Tech News & AnalysisSamsung Starts One UI 9 (Android 17) Rollout on Galaxy S26 SeriesSep 17, 2026
  • Microsoft Windows Surface Event Oct 7 2026 |
    Tech News & AnalysisMicrosoft Confirms October 7 Windows and Surface Event for Local AI PCsSep 16, 2026
  • Apple Ios 27 Siri Ai Featured |
    Tech News & AnalysisApple Releases iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate With Siri AISep 15, 2026
More Tech News & Analysis stories →

Footer

Discover

  • About TechEngage
  • Company News & Updates
  • Our Team
  • Advertise
  • Send us a tip
  • Startup Submissions
  • TechEngage Brand Kit
  • Contact us
  • Tools

Legal pages

  • Editorial Standards
  • Reviews Policy
  • Our Ethics
  • Corrections Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Copyright & DMCA

Must reads

  • Best Mechanical Keyboards Under $100
  • Best USB-C Hubs
  • Best Portable SSDs
  • Best Gaming Graphics Cards (GPUs)
  • Best Long-Range Outdoor WiFi Extenders
  • Best Wireless CarPlay Adapters
  • Best Slack Alternatives
  • Best Long-Range Walkie-Talkies

About TechEngage

TechEngage® is an independent technology publication covering tech news, reviews and buying guides since 2003.

Founded
2003
Publisher
TechAbout LLC
ISSN
2690-3776
Google NewsRSS feed

© 2026 TechEngage®. All Rights Reserved. TechEngage® is a project of TechAbout LLC.

TechEngage® is a registered trademark in the United States under Trademark Number 6823709 and in the United Kingdom under Trademark Number UK00003417167. It is also ISSN protected under ISSN 2690-3776 and has OCLC Number 1139335774.

Contact [email protected] · WhatsApp +1-307-381-8801