FBI made the Ohio case suspect unlock his iPhone X today

Must Read

Huawei unveils Mate 30 Pro with 7,680fps slow-mo and Waterfall display

Despite the tensions between US-China regarding trade wars, Huawei officially announces the all-new Huawei Mate 30 series without Google...

How to solve iOS update problems

A newer and enhanced version of anything encourages people to try. This is because it brings convenience...

The number one reason vaping devices explode

Over the past several years, we’ve watched so-called “cigalikes” and vapes steal the show from Big Tobacco...
Avatar for Jazib Zaman
Amnah Fawad
Content writer by profession, but scientist at heart who secretly believes the conspiracy theories about AI taking over the world. Tech-savvy lover of sci-fi thrillers who loves to travel.

Did you just say ‘I saw that coming?’

Well, many did. Since the launch of FaceID last year, there has been a lot of buzz about how it could be misused.
Just recently a suspect who was being ransacked by the FBI was made to unlock his iPhone X using the FaceID. The officers then looked for the evidence in his phone. It is the first case of its kind that used FaceID technology to disclose the evidence.
The suspect, 28-years-old Grant Michalski, was charged with possessing child pornography. The officers had a search warrant and collected all the evidence necessary to prove him guilty. The search provided them with substantial evidence including the suspect’s chat on Kik Messenger in which he discussed abuse of minors as per the affidavit’s narrative.
It was further revealed that the suspect also had a conversation with Knight (an undercover agent trying to get the suspect to talking). The ad he posted under Craiglist with ‘taboo’ as its title, too, raised suspicions.
Not a lot of the evidence could be found as the device was locked out with a passcode. While the police are equipped with tools that can bypass the passcode, the FBI needed a second search warrant for a more thorough search of all his belongings.
Jerome Greco, staff attorney at the Legal Aid Society told Forbes:
“Traditionally, using a person’s face as evidence or to obtain evidence would be considered lawful. But never before have we had so many people’s own faces be the key to unlock so much of their private information”
As stated earlier, it is not the first time, law enforcement agencies have manipulated the use of high-tech features. We have seen cases where these agencies have used the fingerprints of the dead to unlock their biometric systems.
Should this be considered unlawful even when the justice is at stake? Tell us what you think in the comments section below!

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

Huawei unveils Mate 30 Pro with 7,680fps slow-mo and Waterfall display

Despite the tensions between US-China regarding trade wars, Huawei officially announces the all-new Huawei Mate 30 series without Google...

How to solve iOS update problems

A newer and enhanced version of anything encourages people to try. This is because it brings convenience in life when something promises...

The number one reason vaping devices explode

Over the past several years, we’ve watched so-called “cigalikes” and vapes steal the show from Big Tobacco and the cigarette industry, as...

How to sync Google Drive with OneDrive

Nowadays, cloud storage is becoming more and more popular as a means of storing and backing up data. Among multiple cloud drives,...

Apple TV+ is just $4.99 per month, free first year with new Apple products

The Apple Event 2019 took place on September 10th, 2019, in Cupertino, California. The event highlighted various upcoming releases by Apple, and one...

More Articles Like This