• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

TechEngage®

Connecting mankind with technology

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Cryptocurrency
  • How-to
  • Roundups
  • Science
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Space
  • Apps
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Noteworthy
    • Culture
    • Events
    • Deals
    • Startups
      • Startup Submissions
  • Videos
  • Tools
TechEngage » Opinion

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai is ecstatic after Congress fails to save net neutrality

Fazeel Ashraf Follow Fazeel Ashraf on Twitter Updated: October 1, 2020

A portrait of Ajit Pai smiling, congress fails to save net neutrality
By Gage Skidmore | Wikimedia Commons
FacebookTweetPinLinkedInPrintEmail

Many US citizens were hopeful that net neutrality would be saved once Democrats took back the House in 2019. But their hopes were quashed when Congress failed to turn back net neutrality rules in time. Republicans and FCC Chairman Ajit Pai were ecstatic with the outcome.

Pai said:

“I’m pleased that a strong bipartisan majority of the U.S. House of Representatives declined to reinstate heavy-handed Internet regulation. They did the right thing—especially considering the positive results for American consumers since the adoption of the Restoring Internet Freedom Order.”

Pai’s statement, which he issued on January 2, is a smack in the face of ex-president Barack Obama. It was under Obama’s supervision when net neutrality rules were implemented. These remarks are typical of Republicans in response to net neutrality.

The current FCC refers to net neutrality rules as “depression-era” regulations that put limitations on Internet providers. But FCC’s murder of net neutrality is completely unconstitutional. The 1996 Telecommunications act says the Internet should be unrestricted by state or federal regulation laws.

According to the Telecommunications Act:

“It is the policy of the United States…to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services, unfettered by Federal or State regulation.”

The excuses given by FCC are baseless accusations meant to throw dirt in the eyes of consumers. Free and open Internet should be considered a human right.

The “strong bipartisan majority” statement is another lie. Democrats needed just 30 more votes to undo Pai’s net neutrality laws. Pai’s orders could have been overruled under the Congressional Review Act of 1996. This law would have enabled Congress to undo regulations issued in the last 60 legislative days.

But the effort was weak. It would have been made possible if Democrats had won enough votes in the House before the end latest legislative session. But they couldn’t get the numbers, even though they won a vote to reverse the repeal in the Senate.

The Congressional Review Act helped roll-back FCC’s disturbing broadband privacy rules allowing Internet service providers to collect users’ data and sell it to corporations. Both the House and Senate passed a joint resolution to overturn this barbaric FCC policy.

But the CRA could not be used to repeal net neutrality to its glory days of 2015. The act failed to dismiss Pai’s Restoring Internet Freedom Act, which eliminated net neutrality.

Even though trying to save net neutrality turned out to be a lost cause, it showed Americans which politicians are willing to fight for the cause.

Pai continues to insist the RIF policy is in the best interests of the people and that that the Internet “has remained free and open. Broadband speeds are up with download speeds in the United States increasing more than 35% in 2018, according to a recent report from Ookla. Internet access is also expanding, and the digital divide is closing.”

The first statement about the Internet being free and open has been proven to be a lie. US telecom companies were found guilty of throttling speeds for Youtube and Netflix users. This is just one example of countless unscrupulous acts.

Internet providers continue to batter users with unwanted ads, throttle services, and transform the Internet experience into a nightmare. The FCC itself investigated network providers for giving false reports about broadband expansion in the US. So how can one trust Ajit Pai’s statements?

The RIF Act hasn’t made any positive impact on the Internet experience. The only winners in this whole mess are the Internet providers who received a lucrative $2 billion tax break. But there is still hope as the FCC could face legal repercussions if the policies get implemented ruthlessly.

Perhaps the ISPs won’t be as brutal as the FCC has been in implementing these policies. It is still possible that these policies could get overruled in a year or two. But it will take a strong legislative effort in order to make this happen.

This post was originally published on January 5, 2019 and was updated on October 1, 2020.

Filed Under: Opinion, Internet Tagged With: AjitPai, Congress, Democrats, FCC, UnitedStates

Related Stories

  • Non-Disclosure Agreement and Drafting of Demand Letter

    Non-Disclosure Agreement and Drafting of Demand Letter

  • Child abuse images being traded on encrypted apps

    Child abuse images being traded on encrypted apps

  • Questions we need Google Stadia to answer in summer 2019

    Questions we need Google Stadia to answer in summer 2019

FacebookTweetPinLinkedInPrintEmail

About Fazeel Ashraf

IT graduate from the National University of Science and Technology with a passion for writing. When not reading or writing, I can be found listening to rock and metal or playing some classic jams on my electric guitar. I’m also a big fan of horror movies.

Reader Interactions

Share Your Thoughts Cancel reply

Please read our comment policy before submitting your comment. Your email address will not be used or published anywhere. You will only receive comment notifications if you opt to subscribe below.

Primary Sidebar

Become a contributor

We are accepting contributor applications. All applications will be decided in 3 days after applying. To learn more visit the contributors page.
TextSheet Alternative

6 Top Alternatives to Textsheet for 2025

Muhammad Zeshan Sarwar October 5, 2024

battery draining apps

Top 10 battery draining apps to avoid 2025

Muhammad Abdullah October 5, 2024

Recent Stories

  • 6 Top Alternatives to Textsheet for 2025
  • Top 10 battery draining apps to avoid 2025
  • The Benefits of Having a Small Air Compressor for Flat Tires
  • 4 Best Free VPNs for 2025
  • 9 Best Calendar Apps in 2025

Footer

Discover

  • About us
  • Newsroom
  • Staff
  • Advertise
  • Send us a tip
  • Startup Submission Questionnaire
  • Brand Kit
  • Contact us

Legal pages

  • Reviews Guarantee
  • Community Guidelines
  • Corrections Policy and Practice
  • Cookies Policy
  • Our Ethics
  • Disclaimer
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Must reads

  • Best AirPods alternatives on Amazon
  • Best PC monitors for gaming on Amazon
  • Best family board games
  • Best video doorbells without subscription
  • Best handheld video game consoles
  • Best all-season tires for snow
  • Best mobile Wi-Fi hotspots
  • Best treadmills on Amazon

Download our apps

TechEngage app coming soon on App Store

© 2024 TechEngage®. All Rights Reserved. TechEngage® is a project of TechAbout LLC.

TechEngage® is a registered trademark in the United States under Trademark Number 6823709 and in the United Kingdom under Trademark Number UK00003417167. It is also ISSN protected under ISSN 2690-3776 and has OCLC Number 1139335774.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy