• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TechEngage®

TechEngage®

Connecting mankind with technology

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Cryptocurrency
  • How-to
  • Roundups
  • Science
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Space
  • Apps
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Noteworthy
    • Culture
    • Events
    • Deals
    • Startups
      • Startup Submissions
  • Videos
  • Tools
TechEngage » Syndication
Sponsored Story

Contract-based Tests vs. End-to-End Tests: Which Is Better for Your APIs?

Avatar Of Muhammad Zeshan Sarwar Muhammad Zeshan Sarwar December 28, 2019

A photo of code on a screen
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Do you develop application programming interfaces (APIs) for a living or just as a hobby? Whichever the case, it’s important that you subject your project to rigorous testing before releasing it to the public. This is because only repeated and thorough rounds of testing ensure that your API works as you’ve coded it.

Testing also assists you in identifying bugs and security flaws that you might miss, even with a thorough quality check of the code. These benefits and more can be a major contributing factor to your ability to put out a reliable product. Because of this, testing should always be a high priority for you, as well as choosing a comprehensive API testing tool like that on Stoplight with which to perform those tests.

With this in mind, there are two specific types of API testing that are proving to be a hot topic of debate within the developing global community. These types are contract-based tests and end-to-end tests, and the debates center on whether one or the other is better for APIs. In this article, we’ll delve deeper into this subject and examine the arguments for both, while doing our best to provide you with an answer to this dilemma. But first, let’s briefly explain what these two tests are.

What is Contract-based Testing?

Contract-based testing is a testing type that checks the contract agreement between a consumer endpoint and an API provider endpoint. Simply put, it tests if the API can facilitate the expected connection between the system providing the API and the system interacting with or “consuming” the API. This type of test also checks if that connection works as designed.

An example of this would be when a user interacts with an online shopping website and tries out its search product function. The API behind that search product function should be able to facilitate the interaction between the user and the website’s database of products and deliver the desired response in the format that the user expects. This facilitation of communication and delivery of responses is what contract-based testing checks, as well as whether both endpoints are active.

What is End-to-end Testing?

End-to-end testing, however, is a full systems test. It checks not only the API and the service it provides but also the entire application implementing it—from the beginning of the user workflow to the very end. Performing an end-to-end test naturally allows you to see every workflow chain involving the application and its APIs. As such, you will be able to easily see if there is anything you missed in terms of flaws or coding issues.

What are the arguments for and against both?

Both contract-based testing and end-to-end testing have their place in the API testing toolbox. While it can be argued that contract-based testing only scratches the surface of an API’s functionality, it is a less time-intensive check than end-to-end testing. This means that contract-based testing can give you a way to quickly see if your API’s basic functionality is working without having to meticulously go down and check every interaction path—i.e., a smoke test.

As for end-to-end testing, while it may seem to be the superior option due to it involving the API and nearly everything around it, it doesn’t change the fact that it still takes an inordinate amount of time to do so.

Which is better for your API?

The answer is clear: both of them are better for your API rather than just one or the other. Contract-based testing can help you find the huge and glaring flaws in your code that effectively stops your API cold, while end-to-end testing allows you to sniff out the bugs and flaws that are too complicated or too minute to see through casual code checking and QA. They may vary in terms of scope and the time it takes for them to run, but their end goal is the same. Effectively utilizing both tests according to your situation will result in a more agile and robust developing process.

Our recommendation, then, is that you should work on implementing both styles in your testing process. Use contract-based testing first as a baseline and, when you believe that there is a need to dive down into your code to hunt for elusive bugs and errors, enlist the help of end-to-end testing. By adopting this practice and avoiding unnecessary overlap between the two in your API testing, you will end up with a more reliable and issue-free product for public release.

Disclosure: This is a sponsored post, we were compensated to publish this article on our website. Learn more about our disclaimer.

Related Tags: Sponsored

Related Stories

  • How To Find The Best Deals On Price Comparison Websites?

    How To Find The Best Deals On Price Comparison Websites?

  • Why Is The Synology Nas Data Recovery System Useful

    Why is the Synology NAS data recovery system useful

  • The Benefits Of Using A Virtual Room Designer For Your Next Home Remodel

    The benefits of using a virtual room designer for your next home remodel

Avatar Of Muhammad Zeshan Sarwar

Muhammad Zeshan Sarwar

Tech Reporter, Editor & Co-Founder

Tech Enthusiast and motivational tech writer advocating for fair tech policies and covering all news related to the mobile industry and more.

Reader Interactions

Share Your Thoughts Cancel reply

Please read our comment policy before submitting your comment. Your email address will not be used or publish anywhere. You will only receive comment notifications if you opt to subscribe below.

Primary Sidebar

Become a contributor

We are accepting contributor applications. All applications will be decided in 3 days after applying. To learn more click here.
TechEngage-Apple-News
TechEngage-Google-News
An image of MacBook M1

Best accessories for M1 MacBook Air/Pro

The Latest TVs of 2021

The latest TVs of 2023: Most popular televisions

Recent Stories

  • 6 Ways to Transfer Photos from iPhone to External Hard Drive (2023)
  • 10 Best Calendar Apps in 2023
  • 5 Internet Security Suites to Get For Fortifying Your Internet Security
  • 7 Best Youtube to MP3 Converters for 2023
  • Top 100 Technology Blogs for Guest Posting

Footer

Discover

  • About us
  • Newsroom
  • Staff
  • Advertise
  • Send us a tip
  • Startup Submission Questionnaire
  • Brand Kit
  • Contact us

Legal pages

  • Reviews Guarantee
  • Community Guidelines
  • Corrections Policy and Practice
  • Cookies Policy
  • Our Ethics
  • Disclaimer
  • GDPR Compliance
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Must reads

  • Best AirPods alternatives on Amazon
  • Best PC monitors for gaming on Amazon
  • Best family board games
  • Best Graphics Cards (GPUs) for gaming
  • Best video doorbells without subscription
  • Best handheld video game consoles
  • Best all-season tires for snow
  • Best mobile Wi-Fi hotspots
  • Best treadmills on Amazon
  • Best AM radios for long-distance reception

Download our apps

TechEngage-app-google-play-store
TechEngage app coming soon on App Store

Copyright © 2023 · All Rights Reserved · TechEngage® is a Project of TechAbout LLC.
TechEngage® is a registered trademark in United Kingdom under Trademark Number UK00003417167 and is ISSN protected under the ISSN 2690-3776 and OCLC Number 1139335774.

Go to mobile version